Fox v. City of Bowling Green
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
We hold that to gain the protection of R.C. 4113.52(A)(3), an employee need not show that a co-worker had actually violated a statute, city ordinance, work rule, or company policy; it is sufficient that the employee had a reasonable belief that a violation occurred.
Ohio’s Whistleblower statute provides an employee protection from employer retaliation under certain circumstances when the employee reports activity of fellow employees in the workplace. R.C. 4113.52(A)(3) provides:
“If an employee becomes aware in the course of his employment of a violation by a fellow employee of any state or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Contreras v. Ferro Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Stephen B. Himmel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Black v. Columbus Public SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Hageman v. Bryan City School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Anders v. Specialty Chemical Resources, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.