Legal Opinion

Fox v. City of Bowling Green

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1996No. 94-2544PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

We hold that to gain the protection of R.C. 4113.52(A)(3), an employee need not show that a co-worker had actually violated a statute, city ordinance, work rule, or company policy; it is sufficient that the employee had a reasonable belief that a violation occurred.

Ohio’s Whistleblower statute provides an employee protection from employer retaliation under certain circumstances when the employee reports activity of fellow employees in the workplace. R.C. 4113.52(A)(3) provides:

“If an employee becomes aware in the course of his employment of a violation by a fellow employee of any state or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Contreras v. Ferro Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stephen B. Himmel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Black v. Columbus Public SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  4. Hageman v. Bryan City School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Anders v. Specialty Chemical Resources, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API