Field v. Hastings & Bradley Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa
This was a creditors’ bill by Marshall Meld and others against, the Hastings & Bradley Company and others. The defendants having answered, the complainants except to the answers for impertinence and insufficiency.
1Opinion of the Court
SHIRAS, District Judge.
In the bill filed in this case the complainants aver that on the 22d day of May, 1894, they obtained judgment on the law side of ihis court for the sum of $2,019.27 against the Hastings & Bradley Company; that execution thereon has been duly issued, and returned unsatisfied; that the judgment, defendant has made a fraudulent transfer of its property to its co-defendants, the details of the transaction claimed to he fraudulent being set out at length. The bill prays a decree setting aside the alleged fraudulent transfers of property, and expressly waives answer under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ex Parte BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Preston v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. MundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Defiance Water Co. v. City of DefianceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1900
- Tillinghast v. ChaceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1903
- Whittemore v. PattenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
- Brown v. McDonaldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.