Legal Opinion

Cuneo v. Cuneo

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGavagan, J.

This is an action to declare the marriage of the parties null and void. They were married in the city of New York on September 4, 1948. The gist of the action is the fraudulent and deceitful representations of the defendant (then a resident and citizen of Karbach, G-ermany) that plaintiff was the cause of her then pregnancy and was the father of her child. The evidence is clear and, in fact, admitted that plaintiff, while a member of the armed forces of the United States, did cohabit with defendant in Karbach, Germany, within the period of gestation. Upon receipt of defendant’s advice of her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Kennedy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. In Re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Annual Accounts of HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GromoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Anthony v. AnthonyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. A. C. v. B. C.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Beck v. BeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Torino v. CruzNew York City Family Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API