Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 23, 2001No. 1 CA-CV-01-0008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants Michael Hernandez (“Hernandez”) and Ida Hernandez raise several issues on appeal, including a challenge to the use of their notice of claim for impeachment purposes. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s rulings.
I. BACKGROUND
¶2 We review the facts in the light most favorable to the prevailing party. Todaro v. Gardner, 72 Ariz. 87, 91, 231 P.2d 435, 437 (1951). Hernandez and his family arrived at Patagonia Lake State Park at dusk on a Friday. They had visited the park at least twice before.
¶3 Hernandez and his son, Michael Hernandez, Jr.,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bernard F. McNely v. Ocala Star-Banner Corporation, a Florida Corporation the New York Times Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Ramada Development Company v. Martin W. Rauch, Defendants-Third Party J. Stewart Stein, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Selby v. SavardArizona Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Hernandez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Hernandez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2002