Fairchild v. Kilbourne
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Shortly after 5:30 p. m. on the evening of December 15,1920, plaintiff and defendant, each driving an automobile, had a collision at a *458street intersection in Minneapolis. The streets intersected at right angles, but with a jog of 18 feet to the east of the street upon which plaintiff was proceeding south. Defendant had the right of way. Neither was aware of the other’s approach until the collision. Both cars were damaged. Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $523.33. Defendant appears to have an action pending against plaintiff for damages on account of this accident. The appeal is from an order…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Raymond Bros. Motor Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Jacobs v. BellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Szyperski v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936