Legal Opinion
Aliens for Better Immigration Laws v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1994No. 94 Civ. 1472 (LLS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, housekeepers and child-care workers seeking permanent resident visas 1 (also known as “green cards”), claim that a provision of Pub.L. No. 101-649, 104 Stat. 4987-94 (1990) (the “1990 Amendments”), which amended the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (the “Act”), violates their rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Each of the plaintiffs has obtained a labor certification from the Department of Labor, (Complaint, ¶¶ 8-12), as a prerequisite to being classified for and receiving…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rahman v. McElroyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Hsiao v. PizzelaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021