Legal Opinion

Southern S. S. Co. v. Sheppeard

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 11, 1929No. 374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

This is an equity action brought under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 USCA §§ 901-950) to enjoin the taking effect of an award of the commissioner in favor of one' Cisro Cummings, plaintiff, alleging that for and in consideration of the sum of $260 paid him, and the further consideration of plaintiff’s promise to take him back into plaintiff’s employ at the same rate of pay earned by him before the accident, Cisro Cummings executed a release, a covenant not to sue, and acknowledgment of full satisfaction of his claim against the Southern…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lumber Mut. Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Boston v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  3. Barber Asphalt Corporation v. Industrial Comm.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Henderson v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  5. California Ship Service Co. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API