Legal Opinion

Staubsandt v. Lennon

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 6, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Eugene Staubsandt and Bobert F. Staubsandt against William F. Lennon and David Conover to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. From a judgment of foreclosure entered on the report of a referee,, defendant William F. Lennon appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.

The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s, lien for a balance of $800 claimed to be due under a certain contract between plaintiffs and defendant Lennon for painting and other-work upon five houses on West Mnety-Mnth street, in this city. The-complaint alleged performance, which was denied by the answer.. The referee found that the contract was substantially performed, and, after allowing $100 for some shortcomings, found that the-plaintiffs were entitled to $700, and interest, and that they had a valid lien for that amount. The defendants contend that the find*545ings show a failure of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elting v. DaytonNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Stove Works v. KlingmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Cunningham v. DoyleNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API