Legal Opinion

People v. Carlos Tapia

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 2019No. 19Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 19 The People &c., Respondent, v. Carlos Tapia, Appellant. Daniel A. Rubens, for appellant. James J. Wen, for respondent. DiFIORE, Chief Judge: The issue presented in this appeal is whether a portion of a testifying witness’s prior grand jury testimony was properly admitted as a past recollection recorded to supplement his trial testimony. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the -1- -2- No. 19 grand jury testimony as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API