Legal Opinion
United States v. Abraham Jacob Alkhabaz, Also Known as Jake Baker
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1997No. 95-1797PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMabtin, C. J., joined by Daughtrey, J.,
KRUPANSKY, J. (pp. 1496-1507), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Chief Judge.
Claiming that the district court erred in determining that certain electronic mail messages between Abraham Jacob Alkhabaz, a.k.a. Jake Baker, and Arthur Gonda did not constitute “true threats,” the government appeals the dismissal of the indictment charging Baker with violations of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c).
From November 1994 until approximately January 1995, Baker and Gonda exchanged e-mail messages over the Internet, the content of which expressed a sexual interest in violence against women…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. ApfelbaumSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Russell KelnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Larry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Daniel Brewington v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. ClemensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Franklin Jeffries, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Clifford HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- State v. CressOhio Supreme Court · 2006
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.