Legal Opinion

United States v. Clemens

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 10, 2013No. 17-1592PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

We are invited in this case to change our circuit law on the type of intent needed by a defendant to communicate “true threats” under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). We note there is a circuit split on the question of intent in the aftermath of Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343, 123 S.Ct. 1536, 155 L.Ed.2d 535 (2003). The issue was not raised before the trial court, and on plain error review we see no reason to depart from this circuit’s law that an objective test of defendant’s intent is used from the defendant’s vantage point- under § 875(c). United States v. Whiffen, 121 F.3d 18, 21…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Abdel-Jabbor Malik, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Blum v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. SayerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. State v. BoettgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. Knox, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. United States v. FerminCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API