Jenswold v. Minnesota Canal Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Carlton county to determine the adverse claims of defendants to vacant and unoccupied land. Defendant Jacob R. Meyers alone appeared and answered. The case was tried before Dibell,' J., who found in favor of defendant. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to determine adverse claims to certain real property, in which defendants had judgment, and plaintiff appealed.
The short facts are as follows: On March 22, 1897, a tax judgment was duly entered against the land in question for the taxes of 1895. *383On May 3, 1897, at the tax sale for that year, the same was, for want of a purchaser, bid in for the state; and on August 25, 1899, the state assigned its right to plaintiff. At the time the assignment was made, plaintiff paid the taxes for the years 1896 and 1897, and there is no controversy as to the validity of the proceedings leading up to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watkins v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Midland Co. v. EbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Roessler v. RomerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Santa Fe Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Burbridge v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Casareto v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Brodie v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Portland Terminal Inv. Co v. Porter Industrial Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.