Dixie Queen Produce Co. v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
1. A suit brought in the name Dixie Queen Produce Co. is not subject to general demurrer on the ground that the name does not import a legal entity, because the petition alleges that Dixie Queen Produce Co. is not a corporation. A complete review of the cases on the subject is found in Johnson & Johnson Constr. Co. v. Pioneer Neon Supply Co., 96 Ga. App. 867 (101 S. E. 2d 918) and Mortemoth Co. v. Southeastern Fur Co., 98 Ga. App. 637 (106 S. E. 2d 194). It may be added that under Code Ch. 106-3 the appellation “company,” may be used by an individual, and is as appropriate to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolidated Distributors Inc. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Martin v. Bartow Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Brown v. MathisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Bartram v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Hollingsworth v. RedwineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.