Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Jamerson v. John

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Return of an order to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not issue.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This proceeding is instituted for the purpose of obtaining from this court a writ of prohibition restraining the defendants, who. constitute the Peacemakers’ Court of the Seneca Nation of Indians of the Cattaraugus Reservation, from proceeding in a certain action commenced in said Peacemakers’ Court against the relators.

It appears from the petition and return that the relators and defendants are all members of the Seneca *419Nation of Indians residing on the Cattaraugus Reservation in this state. That the Iroquois Agricultural Society is a corporation created by chapter 434 of the Laws of New…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Manice v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. People Ex Rel. Demarest v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. People ex rel. Ward v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Hatch v. LuckmanNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rice v. MaybeeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933
  2. United States ex rel. Pierce v. WaldowDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1923
  3. Shongo v. ShongoNew York County Court, Erie County · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API