Legal Opinion

Rice v. Maybee

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 27, 1933No. 973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The parties hereto- are Seneca Indians, residing on the Cattaraugus Reservation, in the state of New York. On or about October 31, 1903, one Solomon Maybee executed an instrument in writing wherein he purported to convey all his interest in certain lands on such reservation in trust to one Hattie Jemison for the benefit of his wife, named therein Hattie Jemison, and their four daughters, such trust to become effective on the death of Solomon Maybee and to continue during the lives of said mother and daughters. Plaintiff herein, one of the cestui que trust, has succeeded…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tenorio v. TenorioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Andrews v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  3. Button v. SnyderDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934
  4. People ex rel. Charles v. BlackchiefDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934
  5. Washburn v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API