Legal Opinion

Seibert v. Baxter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Fh'ror from Marion District Court. Action for the recovery of land, and for rents and profits. Judgment for plaintiff, Baxter, at the June Term, 1885. The defendant, Seibert, brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

Edson Baxter brought this action against Henry Seibert for the recovery of 40 acres of land in Marion county, and also for the rents and profits of the land while the possession was withheld. The court found that Baxter was seized in fee of the land, and was entitled to recover the same from the defendant Seibert, and also that the plaintiff was entitled to recover for the rents and profits thereof for three years prior to the commencement of the action. Judgment was accordingly given. Seibert brings the case here for review, but complains…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gatton v. TolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Lary v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kahm v. KlausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Harlan v. LoomisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Long v. BagwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Story v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Tiger v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API