Legal Opinion

Hilen v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided September 29, 2005No. 21768-03UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH D. HILEN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Hilen v. Comm'r

No. 21768-03

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2005-226; 2005 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 226; 90 T.C.M. (CCH) 333;

September 29, 2005, Filed

Brian G. Isaacson and Duncan C. Turner, for petitioner.

Sandra Veliz, for respondent.

Haines, Harry A.

Harry A. Haines

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HAINES, Judge: This case is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 121. 1 The issue for decision is whether petitioner received gross income from the exercise of nonstatutory stock options in 1999.

Backgr…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Florida Peach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Zaentz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  4. Miriam Sakol v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Sakol v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palahnuk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Facq v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  3. Kadillak v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  4. Racine v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  5. Anthony J. Kadillak v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API