Legal Opinion

Hearn v. City of Bakersfield

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 24, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00668Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MATTHEW ALAN HEARN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00668-CDB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE 11 v. (Docs. 70-71) 12 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION 13 Defendants. (Doc. 76) 14 15 16 Introduction 17 Plaintiff Matthew Alan Hearn (“Plaintiff”) asserts causes of action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983 and state law against Defendants City of Bakersfield, Christian Walter Hernandez V, Nathan A. 19 Anderberg (collectively “City Defendants”), and S. Jauch, and County of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Dewayne Bearchild v. Kristy CobbanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API