Legal Opinion

Williams v. Paxton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1977No. 11602Published

1Opinion of the Court

559 P.2d 1123 (1976)

98 Idaho 155

Mary O. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Harry PAXTON and Paul W. Bright, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 11602.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

May 13, 1976.

On Rehearing January 13, 1977.

Dennis L. Cain, Sallaz, Scanlan, Beer & Cain, Boise, for defendants-appellants.

Samuel Kaufman, Jr., Anderson, Kaufman, Anderson & Ringert, Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

BAKES, Justice.

The pivotal question in this appeal is whether a judgment creditor who obtained judgment jointly against a married woman and her husband, based upon obligations under a contract which both she and her husband…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Suter v. SuterIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. Bank of Commerce, Ltd. v. BaldwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API