Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. Hartman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 1992No. 69. M.D. Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
Appellants instituted this action by filing a Petition for Review in Commonwealth Court seeking mandamus and equitable and declaratory relief arising out of a purported veto by the Legislature of a proposed air pollution regulation. This veto barred publication of the regulation as final in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. Commonwealth Court dismissed the petition holding that the Appellants lacked standing. 130 Pa.Cmwlth. 100, 567 A.2d 339. Appellants seek further review from this Court under § 723(a) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a), as a direct appeal from a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Costopoulos v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Franklin Township v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Franklin Tp. v. COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RESOURCESSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Cogan v. County of BeaverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Clark v. Cambria County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Merlino v. Delaware CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.