Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners of Charities & Correction v. Darge

New York Marine Court

Decided September 23, 1881Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The commissioners of charities and correction, when suing as overseers of the poor, must sue in their individual names, with their official designation added (Supervisors, &c., v. Stimson, 4 Hill, 136; Comm’ rs, &c., v. Peck, 5 Id. 215 ; Paige v. Fazackerly, 36 Barb. 392 ; Gould v. Glass, 19 Id. 179; Hill & Den. *374Supp. 279 ; Agent, &c. v. Rickeman, 1 Den. 279 ; Trustees, &c., v. Acker, 26 How. Pr. 263; Hathaway v. Town of Homer, 5 Lans. 273 ; Hart v. Benson, 18 How. Pr. 302). The “ board,” as such, lias no legal entity, and is incapable of maintaining an action. The statute calls these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paige v. FazackerlyNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Agent of the State Prison v. RikemamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Hathaway v. Town of HomerNew York Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Board of Trustees v. AckerNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Hait v. BensonNew York Supreme Court · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API