Legal Opinion

Agent of the State Prison v. Rikemam

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Decided May 15, 1845PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Bronson, Ch. J.

A sufficient answer is given to the motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, and it is denied, but the plaintiff must stipulate to try the cause at the next circuit to be held in the county of Westchester.

The motion to amend must be granted. It is settled that the office of supervisor cannot sue. (Supervisor of Galway v. Stimson, 4 Hill, 136.) And I am unable to comprehend how any office can either sue or be sued, though the person holding the office may have a capacity to do and suffer both. The law has provided in many cases that an officer may sue in his name…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Final v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. County Treasurer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Paige v. FazackerlyNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. People ex rel. Ottman v. Commissioners of Highways of SewardNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Bell v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API