Board of Education v. Buffalo Teachers Federation, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Denman, P. J.
Defendant, Buffalo Teachers Federation, Inc. (BTF), appeals from a judgment declaring that plaintiff, the Board of Education for the City School District of the City of Buffalo (Board), "has no obligation to legislatively approve or implement by funding the Tentative Agreement reached on September 1, 1990” between the parties. Supreme Court also dismissed BTF’s counterclaims and denied BTF’s cross motion for summary judgment.
This appeal is the second time the parties have appeared before us concerning a dispute over the validity of a collective bargaining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Divisich v. MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Di Maggio v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Reese v. LombardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Association of Surrogates & Supreme Court Reporters v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- John E. Creedon Police Benevolent Ass'n v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Education for City School District v. Buffalo Teachers Federation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Buffalo Retired Teachers 91-94 Alliance v. Board of Education for City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Buffalo Retired Teachers 91-94 Alliance v. Board of Education for City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- North v. MurtaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996