Legal Opinion
St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. v. Janssen-Counotte
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 23, 2015No. Case No. 3:15-MC-00099-SIPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA
(Principal case pending in U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Austin Div., Case No. A-14-CA-877-SS)
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
There are two threshold issues presented in the pending motion to compel compliance with a third-party subpoena that need to be resolved before it is appropriate to turn to the more specific objections raised by the subpoena recipient. The first concerns the circumstances under which a domestic corporate entity that has been served with a third-party subpoena must also search…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re: Citric Acid Litigation 7-Up Bottling Co.Of Jasper Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Citadel Securities Americas LLC et al v. Portofino Technologies AG, et alDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- E.L. v. FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- E.L. v. FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Hardeep Sull v. State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Board of Dental Examiners, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.