Cherry v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Generally speaking, a demurrer may not be entertained after the answer is filed unless by leave of court the answer is withdrawn, because a defendant is not permitted to answer and demur to one cause of action at the same time. Finch v. Baskerville, 85 N. C., 205; Moseley v. Johnson, 144 N. C., 257; Rosenbacker v. Martin, 170 N. C., 236. But tbis ruling does not apply wben objection is entered to the jurisdiction of the court or to the complaint on the ground tbat it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. C. S., 518, and cases cited.
After the jury bad been impaneled…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People ex rel. Putnam v. Commissioners of Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
- Green v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- McGhee v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Von Glahn v. . DerossettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Finch v. . BaskervilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- James v. Atlantic & East Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Ezzell v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.