Legal Opinion

Branch v. James & Peddy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 30, 1908No. 806PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Complaint, from city court of Dublin — Judge Burch. September 10, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

This was a suit on a purchase-money note given for a mule. It is expressly stipulated in the note that “the seller of said stock or other property does in no wise guarantee, except in title.” The defendant filed a plea of failure of consideration, and attempted to set up, in support of the plea, a parol agreement between him and the seller of the mule, which was in contradiction of the express and unambiguous provision in his written contract. The court excluded this testimony, and, there being no other defense made, directed a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount of the note.

We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNeel v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Jackson v. Langston & CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harrell v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Jones v. George S. Riley Jr. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. McPeak v. BokerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Daniel v. BursonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Mock v. KempCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API