SFP, Inc. v. Hunneman & Co.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, P.J.
This is an action in contract to recover rent allegedly due upon the defendant-tenant’s breach of a commercial lease.
Partial summary judgment upon the plaintiffs Dist/Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 56 motion was granted based on the defendant’s admission that it was in breach of the parties’ commercial lease. The defendant denied, however, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover any damages on the grounds that the plaintiff either “accepted” the defendant’s “surrender” of the premises, or failed to mitigate its damages upon the alleged termination of the parties’ commercial lease.
At a hearing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Edna Goldstein v. Robert E. Kelleher, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Bandera v. DonohueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Delconte v. SalloumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- F & G Pasqualucci, LLC v. Global Naps Realty, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
- Stavert v. AldenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Rosen v. Gold Star Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992