Miller v. Cramer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Benet, J., Charleston, Action by William Starr Miller, George Norton Miller, and Horatio Ray Miller against Horatio C. Hughes, and the same against A. F. C. Cramer, to compel specific performance of their bid for certain real estate. Three cases of like import were tried together on Circuit.
Read the full summary
Before Benet, J., Charleston, Action by William Starr Miller, George Norton Miller, and Horatio Ray Miller against Horatio C. Hughes, and the same against A. F. C. Cramer, to compel specific performance of their bid for certain real estate. Three cases of like import were tried together on Circuit. This Court adopts the Circuit decree, which is as follows, excepting the formal parts: These three cases, involving to a large extent the same facts and the same principles of law, were conducted and argued together before the master, and were also argued together before me, upon exception to the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice McIver.
These two cases, together with another brought by the same plaintiffs against Horatio C. Hughes (the last named, case not being involved in this appeal), all growing ont of the same state of facts substantially, and involving the same principles of law, -were heard *298and considered together by his Honor, Judge Benet, and from his decree the defendants in the two cases named in the title have appealed.
The facts are so fully and clearly stated in the Circuit decree, and the conclusions reached by the Circuit Judge are so…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Kirton v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Buchan v. German American Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- R. E. L. McCaskill Co. v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Powers v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Reid v. KierOregon Supreme Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.