Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Ball

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1943No. Civ. No. 14161Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal from a portion of an order which decrees partial distribution of the assets of the estate of Maude Elizabeth Richards, deceased, to W. H. Ball, being a cash legacy of $2,000 plus $60.67 interest.

*781The decedent, Mande Elizabeth Richards, a single woman, died on March 23,1941, leaving an holographic will, dated May 21, 1939. This will was admitted to probate and, no executor being named, Ben H. Brown, public administrator, was appointed administrator with-the-will annexed, on April 25,1941. The testatrix declared in her will that she had no near relatives, and she disposed of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poledori v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. First Trust & Savings Bank v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Crowther v. Metalite Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Estate of WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Merron v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API