Legal Opinion

J. K. Gill & Co. v. Frank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Multnomah County. The garnishee appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, by M. Koshland, the garnishee. The bill of exceptions shows that at the trial the plaintiffs introduced testimony tending to prove that the garnishee had property in his possession belonging to the judgment debtor, at the the time of the garnishment, of the value of $1,400, and rested. The garnishee then introduced A. Bernheim as a witness in his behalf, who testified that he was the garnishee’s agent and manager at his warehouse when the garnishment was made; .that he received the property in litigation from the judgment debtor,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hallgarten v. OldhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Walsh v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Russell v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  4. Solomon v. BushnellOregon Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zellner v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Stamford Compress Co. v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. BankTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Callahan v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stamford Compress Co. v. Ft. Worth National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API