Legal Opinion

Isensee v. Austin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1896No. 2296PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.— Hon. John R. Winn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an action brought to subrogate the respondents to the rights of the mortgagees of a certain mortgage. The defendants, appellants here, and others of the Austin family, the parties of the second part and who were owners of the timber in question, entered into a contract with John K. Rae and P. M. Isensee, whereby the parties of the first part granted to the parties of the second part the right, privilege and authority to at all times, for a period of *354five years from the date of the contract, go upon the land described and cut thereon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilkes v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. First National Bank v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Citizens Mercantile Co. v. EasomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Macdonald v. FraterWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Palmer v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API