Legal Opinion
Lovelette v. Braun
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided November 22, 1968No. Civ. 4229PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RONALD N. DAVIES, District Judge.
As indicated in the Court’s Memorandum and Order heretofore filed herein, the controlling issue is whether the plaintiff Floyd E. Lovelette and the de fendant Herman J. Braun were co-employees of the defendant Morrison-Knudsen Company and Associates within the meaning of the North Dakota Workmen’s Compensation Act, Chapter 65-01, N.D.C.C., at the time the accident occurred out of which this litigation arose
The uncontroverted facts, as revealed in the record, are as follows:
Morrison-Knudsen, in order to secure trucks for the hauling of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- LeJeune v. Gulf States Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Skelly Oil Co. v. District Court of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Hensley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1968
- Josewski v. Midland Constructors, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schlenk v. Aerial Contractors, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Westman v. DessellierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Wright v. Action Vending Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Stine v. WeinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Schreder v. Cities Service Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.