Legal Opinion

Glick v. Martin and Mohler, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1987No. 02602PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this appeal we consider whether construction companies working on a property can be held liable for damages resulting from a criminal attack occurring on the property. We find that appellants Mary Jean Glick and her husband, David Lynch, Jr., failed to state a cause of action against appellee construction companies; We therefore affirm the order of the trial court sustaining appellees’ demurrer and dismissing appellants’ complaint. 1

In considering preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, we apply the following standards:

[Preliminary objections in the nature of a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Pittsburgh National Bank v. PerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Cipriani v. Sun Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Gingold v. Audi-Nsu-Auto Union, A.G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. DeJesus v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API