Glick v. Martin and Mohler, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
In this appeal we consider whether construction companies working on a property can be held liable for damages resulting from a criminal attack occurring on the property. We find that appellants Mary Jean Glick and her husband, David Lynch, Jr., failed to state a cause of action against appellee construction companies; We therefore affirm the order of the trial court sustaining appellees’ demurrer and dismissing appellants’ complaint. 1
In considering preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, we apply the following standards:
[Preliminary objections in the nature of a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Pittsburgh National Bank v. PerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cipriani v. Sun Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Gingold v. Audi-Nsu-Auto Union, A.G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- DeJesus v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.