Kirsner v. Fleischmann
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
This dispute is over a problem as ancient as the practice of law: the payment of attorney fees. The disgruntled client and appellant is Milton F. Kirsner, who is himself a member of the bar, although he is now primarily active in the real estate business. He appears in this case individually and as president of twenty corporations (also appellants) in which he is sole or principal stockholder. He and his corporations were made defendants in the present action for resisting the appellees’ attempts to col lect a $38,497.65 contingent fee for their services in a tax case. Appellee Fleischmann is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickler Engineering Corp. v. Seminar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- White v. FrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Fenwick Motor Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Frush v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Roland Ex Rel. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Menish v. Polinger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Broadwater v. ArchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.