Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 16, 2015No. 87ag/14PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This attorney discipline proceeding involves a lawyer who abandoned his representation of clients in two unrelated cases and dishonestly refrained from informing Bar Counsel that he had violated a conditional diversion agreement. 1

Charles Trent Thomas (“Thomas”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, agreed to represent Zakary Lee (“Lee”) in a criminal case, and agreed to represent Wanda Sue Sines (“Sines”) in a separation and divorce matter and in a guardianship matter. Thomas abandoned his representation of both Lee and Sines; Thomas failed to attend a hearing in Lee’s criminal case,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrigermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LandeoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Attorney Grievance v. KarambelasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API