Attorney Grievance Commission v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
This attorney discipline proceeding involves a lawyer who abandoned his representation of clients in two unrelated cases and dishonestly refrained from informing Bar Counsel that he had violated a conditional diversion agreement. 1
Charles Trent Thomas (“Thomas”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, agreed to represent Zakary Lee (“Lee”) in a criminal case, and agreed to represent Wanda Sue Sines (“Sines”) in a separation and divorce matter and in a guardianship matter. Thomas abandoned his representation of both Lee and Sines; Thomas failed to attend a hearing in Lee’s criminal case,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrigermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LandeoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Attorney Grievance v. KarambelasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.