Legal Opinion

In Re Granada Partnership Securities Litigations

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 27, 1992No. MDL 837PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM

HARMON, District Judge.

This Amended Memorandum supersedes the Memorandum of even date to correct the contents of footnote 4 on page 3. Pending before the Court are Class Plaintiffs’ Motion For Final Approval of Settlements (Document # 383) and Opposition To Plaintiffs’ Motion For Final Approval of Settlements (Documents ##409, 414, and 415) submitted by Defendants Ernst & Young and Ernst & Whinney, First of Michigan Corporation, and Keck, Mahin, and Cate (the “Non-Settling Defendants”). Having considered the motion, the opposition, the responses, the replies, and the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Cooper Stevedoring Co. v. Fritz Kopke, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Loran W. Robbins, and Allen M. DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
  2. TBG, Inc. v. BendisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Ahearn v. Fibreboard Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
  5. In Re PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API