Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Pierce

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 20, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-2439PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the following motions: (1) defendants Pierce and Simpson’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment; (2) defendants Bajaj and Abrahams’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment; and (3) plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. For the reasons discussed below, the court holds that this action must be dismissed as to all defendants.

I. Factual Background.

This is an action for declaratory and in-junctive relief seeking to declare invalid the sale of Highland Park…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Serra v. United States General Services AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Robishaw Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  3. United States v. $10,000.00 in United States FundsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1994
  4. Andrean v. Secretary of the United States ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  5. In Re GillespieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API