Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Earley
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 24, 2009No. B209782PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
In this probate case, an heir of a decedent's estate sought and obtained an order appointing her administrator of the estate and determining that the decedent died intestate. The administrator later found a holographic will of the decedent. More than five months after the determination of intestacy and more than three months after discovering the will, the administrator filed a petition to admit the will to probate. The trial court denied the petition on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Doe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Montiel, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Bailey v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.