Legal Opinion

Selby v. Jarrett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1911No. 1105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from McIntosh County Court; Frank W. Rushing, Judge. . Action of E. T. Jarrett against J. L. Selby. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

AMES, C.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for a commission for negotiating a sale of certain personal property. The case was originally tried in a justice court, where the plaintiff recovered a judgment. On appeal by the defendant it was tried in the county court, where the plaintiff again recovered a judgment. The substance of the plaintiff’s testimony, which, in view of the verdict of the jury, must be taken here as established, is that he and the defendant jointly owned a barber shop and pool hall; that on the morning of November 20th he sold his interest to the defendant; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Schlegal v. AllertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Williams v. BishopColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Delta & Pine Land Co. v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Menten v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Schlegel v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Ault v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Kelly v. CotnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API