Legal Opinion

Montgomery-Ward & Co., Inc. v. Sewell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1953No. 14185_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.

The only person who could give an accurate account of the manner in which W. M. Sewell, the husband of appellee, Juanita Sewell, sustained his fatal injuries on July 17, 1950, would be the decedent. Since his lips were thereby sealed, plaintiffs, in this suit to recover damages suffered by them as a result of his death, necessarily had to rely solely upon circumstantial evidence to sustain the burden of proving their allegation that defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of Sewell’s death. The jury, by its verdict, found that the burden thus cast upon them had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wells v. Texas Pacific Coal Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. KowsikowsikiTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. BrannenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  4. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. BrannenTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bonner v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. A. L. Myrick, D/B/A Market Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Johana Herrera Morales v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Lilly Lind Brondum and Barthel P. Brondum, Owners of Tract No. J-923-ECourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Robertson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API