Legal Opinion
Kitchen v. Aristech Chemical
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 2, 1991No. C-1-90-102PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, residents of Ohio and Kentucky who live near a chemical manufacturing plant in Haverville, Ohio, (the Haverville Plant), bring this diversity action based on six theories of liability: negligence, nuisance, trespass, fraud, strict liability, and intentional infliction of injury. (Doc. 1). Plaintiffs allege that defendants are responsible for injuries to plaintiffs’ persons and properties as a result of the migration of toxic chemicals from the Haverville Plant. Defendants are Aristech Chemical (Aristech), owner and operator of the Haverville…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- McCallum v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Brown v. St. Joseph CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- SST Castings, Inc. v. Amana Appliances, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Centimark Corp. v. Brown Sprinkler Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- DeBiasi v. Charter County of WayneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.