Legal Opinion
Toronto v. Clyde
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1964No. 10069PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
The plaintiff Secretary of State brought this action for a declaratory judgment to test the constitutionality of the State Finance Act, Chapter 148, S.L.U.1963 (now cited as Secs. 63-2-13, 63-2-15 and 63-2-20, U.C.A.1953).
This Act is purposed to vest in the Governor, and the newly created office of Director of Finance, powers theretofore regarded as vested in the Board of Examiners by the Constitution. 1 From a judgment of the district court declaring certain portions of the new Act unconstitutional, defendants appeal.
There is no dispute in the facts. They were stipulated by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bateman v. Board of ExaminersUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Marioneaux v. CutlerUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Wood v. BudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- University of Utah v. Board of Examiners of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Thoreson v. State Board of ExaminersUtah Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hulbert v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Dean v. RamptonUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. HonableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Dean v. RamptonUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Hulbert v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.