Legal Opinion

McClung Ex Rel. McClung v. Cullison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1905PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Hr,'■or from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

■Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J. :

This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error, Wade L. Me dung, a minor, by William L. Mc-Clung, his guardian against May M. Cullison, a7id numerous other defendants, to set aside a judgment in a foreclosure proceeding, and an order of sale bad thereunder, and to recover the possession of an undivided one-half interest in and to the west half of the southwest quarter of section 6, township 22 north, range 6 west, situated in Garfield county, Oklahoma.

The plaintiff’s amended petition is divided into two counts, denominated first and second causes of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cunningham v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Bayly v. MueheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. De la Ossa v. OxarartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Echols v. ReeburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Jameson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. First National Bank of Tulsa v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Bledsoe v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API