Fouts v. Hood River
Oregon Supreme Court
From Wasco: W. L. Bradshaw, Judge. Action by P. F. Fouts to recover money from the City of Hood River. From a judgment as prayed defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Wolverton
This is an action by P. F. Fouts to recover against the City of Hood River a proportionate amount of plaintiff’s license, tax for the unexpired term for which license was issued to him to engage in the occupation of liquor dealer within the city, cut *495short by an order of prohibition made under the local option act. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.
The single question presented in this ease is whether what is known as the “Local Option Act” (Laws 1905, p. 41, c. 2), initiated with and adopted by the people in June, 1904, is constitutional. It is urged by the. appellant that it is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Santo v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Barto v. . HimrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Fell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Grandy v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. KlineOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1919
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.