Legal Opinion

Miller v. Meadville Food Service, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeal, 188PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action of trespass against Meadville Food Service, Inc., for injuries sustained by the wife-plaintiff when she bit into a foreign substance contained in a piece of pineapple pie which she purchased in defendant’s cafeteria. Defendant filed an appearance but no answer to the complaint, and brought on the record as additional defend ant Fairmont Foods Company, from which corporation it had purchased the pineapple used in preparation of the pie filling. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs for $2,000 “to be divided between…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loch v. ConfairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Loch Et Ux. v. Confair Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Archer v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Hunter v. RossiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kroger Co. v. BeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Mitchell v. ScharfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Freas v. GUBERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Linda Gierek v. Anonymous 1Indiana Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Odom v. Jebroa EnterprisesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API