Herrera v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Judge.
The state has filed a motion for rehearing urging that our holding that Chavez was an accomplice witness be reconsidered. In Lowe v. State, 98 Tex. Cr. R. 501, 267 S. W. 270 and Newton v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 288, 250 S. W. 1036, cited in our original opinion many authorities from our own court are referred to sustaining our present holding. The reasons therefor will appear in Grissman v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 15, 245 S. W. 438; Herring v. State, 42 S. W. 301; Oats v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 131, in all of which cases the same contention was made as is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Lowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Grissman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922