Legal Opinion

Ivie v. City of Oceanlake

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment, brought by E. R. Ivie and Maude Walling Wanker, as plaintiffs, against the city of Oceanlake and others, as *419defendants, to determine the validity of a special election conducted to annex certain territory to the city of Oceanlake. After defendants filed their answer, the plaintiffs, without replying, moved for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court found that there were no disputed issues of fact, allowed the motion, and entered a decree declaring the election void. Defendants appeal from this decree.

Our consideration of this matter is confined…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Tazwell v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Roy v. BeveridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Straub v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Postlethwait v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. Blue Mountain Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Whitehead v. FaganOregon Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API