Legal Opinion

Salomon Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 6, 1992No. 1725, Docket 92-6069PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge:

In the years prior to 1981 plaintiff-appellant Salomon Inc. received tax credits for investments it had made in machinery and equipment assets. In 1981, when Salomon transferred the assets to a subsidiary and then spun-off the subsidiary to its shareholders, defendant-appellee United States required Salomon to pay back a portion of the credits received pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code’s “recapture” provision. See 26 U.S.C. § 47(a)(1) (1976). Salomon claims that recapture was not proper. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Louis J.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Commissioner v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. American Standard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Orr v. Kinderhill Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. And Subsidiaries, F/k/a Trinova Corp. And Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Walt Disney Incorporated v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Di Loreto v. CostiganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. In Re BardenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API