Patricia Holmes, and United States of America, Intervening v. Marion County Office of Family and Children
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Patricia Holmes, an employee of Indiana’s child-welfare system, took two days of paid leave rather than comply with a directive to remove a headwrap required by her faith. She filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, contending that Indiana discriminated against her on account of her religion. She relies on a definition in § 701© of that Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j), which provides that religion “includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Lowe v. Hamilton County Department of Job & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- King v. Marion Circuit CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Lowe v. Hamilton County Department of Job & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Melody Hale v. Indiana Department of Child SeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.