Legal Opinion
McCambridge v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 13, 1989No. 297-87PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
DUNCAN, Judge.
The appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated. Granting his first petition for discretionary review in McCambridge v. State, 712 S.W.2d 499 (Tex.Cr. App.1986), we affirmed the judgment of the First Court of Appeals holding inter alia, that under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution the “[ajppel-lant’s right to counsel did not attach until the complaint and information were filed.” Id., at 502. Consequently, under the Sixth Amendment, the appellant was not entitled to consult with an attorney…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.